Mockingbirdii

247 pages

English language

Published Nov. 13, 1979

ISBN:
978-0-385-14933-4
Copied ISBN!
Goodreads:
1662396

View on OpenLibrary

View on Inventaire

Mockingbird is a 1980 dystopian science fiction novel by American writer Walter Tevis. Set in a far-future New York City, it follows a man who secretly teaches himself to read in a society where literacy has disappeared and daily life is regulated by entertainment and government-issued drugs. The novel was first published in hardcover by Doubleday in 1980. It was a finalist for the Nebula Award for Best Novel in 1980. Contemporary reviewers such as Michael Bishop in The Washington Post and John Nicholson in The Times praised Tevis's storytelling and craft, while later commentators have continued to discuss the novel's themes, including its focus on literacy. In 2022, Searchlight Pictures announced that it was developing a film adaptation with Alma Har'el attached to direct.

3 editions

A decent post-apocalyptic story

(Copied from Goodreads) There was an interesting setup - a superintelligent android, the man who rediscovered reading, a woman who refused to take the mind-control drugs - but there wasn't the payoff in the end that I was hoping for. The long stretches of diary entries by Paul felt like filler in places, not really fitting in to the rest of the story in any way that led somewhere. I think you are supposed to admire the way he reinvents the emotions of love and compassion for himself, but too much of it comes of as kind of obtuse. Probably for its time the way love and sex were depicted in the book were provocative although it's hard to see them that way now. For a dystopian novel there was a lot less of the atmosphere of doom around our characters than most because of the general breakdown in systems …

Review of 'Mockingbird' on 'Goodreads'

There was an interesting setup - a superintelligent android, the man who rediscovered reading, a woman who refused to take the mind-control drugs - but there wasn't the payoff in the end that I was hoping for. The long stretches of diary entries by Paul felt like filler in places, not really fitting in to the rest of the story in any way that led somewhere. I think you are supposed to admire the way he reinvents the emotions of love and compassion for himself, but too much of it comes of as kind of obtuse. Probably for its time the way love and sex were depicted in the book were provocative although it's hard to see them that way now. For a dystopian novel there was a lot less of the atmosphere of doom around our characters than most because of the general breakdown in systems that felt to …

avatar for iconoclast@bookrastinating.com

rated it