kydnmthws reviewed 9-11 by Noam Chomsky
None
4 stars
Brilliant writing, deeply ideologically confused. Are you racist? Are you not racist? Are you just anti-imperialist with a luddite-esque attitude toward conquerors?
Brilliant writing, deeply ideologically confused. Are you racist? Are you not racist? Are you just anti-imperialist with a luddite-esque attitude toward conquerors?
Murakami is one weird bird
All the space I was never given to occupy at 12. Possibly it might be a disconcerting choice of comfort
A white man prattles about women and native Americans, albeit 'nicely'.
Ambitious in conception, but none of the writing was that ambitious at all. Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein in the first industrial revolution with so much more. Brave New World is conceptually brilliant, but it lacks the proper organisation to make it actualise that brilliance.
stop letting men write books
The two stars are for Paul Mescal and Andrew Scott because damn the film was so much better
A raving female bacchanalia, painted exclusively with the nauseating aesthetics of white, upper class, Americanism.
You did the Grimm brothers proud Scottie.
That's seventeen alright
It's, hard. To find a lot of who you are / who you have been, in characters who you know, are moral lessons. It's harder, to be a moral lesson.
Too flowery for me, but got quite good toward the end.
I have this thing about Murakami. He's by no means a bad author, but his books really don't feel like they have any business being books.
fine, I yield. The series is really good.
For the first quarter of the novel, I was fully enamored and in love. Then all that tension and excitement sort of fizzled out into a dull ending.
Don't get me wrong, I intend to read this again and again, but next to reality it just doesn't stack up.