Reviews and Comments

Mayobrot

Mayobrot@books.theunseen.city

Joined 1 year, 12 months ago

I've mostly read sci-fi, but am trying to branch out. I really like to think and talk about books, hope to find people here to chat with!

I sometimes write longer stuff here: a-blog-with.relevant-information.com/posts/

This link opens in a pop-up window

Steven Erikson: The First Collected Tales Of Bauchelain And Korbal Broach (2010, Bantam Press) 3 stars

A more thought out summary

No rating

These are basically Steven Erikson playing around with putting two haughty necromancers and their poor manservant into common fantasy settings. The whole thing is written with humor in mind, kind of like how you can read a normal Terry Pratchett sentence and wonder if that's some word play or not. The first one is a police procedure set in the Malazan equivalent of Ankh-Morpork, the second one is on a pirate ship and the third one is uh not sure how to summarise that one. All in all a good read, and you don't need to have read the other Malazan books to understand, and you won't be spoiled of anything either. It's a valid entry point into the series I think, but it's also much more light hearted, although the density of the prose and the number of characters carries over.

commented on Future Ethics by Cennydd Bowles

Cennydd Bowles, Cennydd Bowles: Future Ethics (Paperback, 2018, NowNext Press) 2 stars

‘Eloquent, insightful and utterly a must read for anyone who is inventing the future or …

Chapter seven is about climate change. Before this I've felt that this book is kind of weak and afraid of taking a stance or to work outside the frame of capitalism, but this chapter has been pretty good.

Oh, and he denounces cryptocurrencies for their ridiculous energy consumption so we're good on that front too.

David E. Nye: Technology matters (2005, MIT Press) No rating

Honestly it's kind of amazing that there was a time when there were electric, steam, and petrol cars were about equally common in USA and it wasn't clear which would come to dominate the market. Steam cars ran on kerosene which was super common, while petroleum wasn't that easy to get. Their main disadvantage was that they were heavy. Electric cars were lighter but had batteries. But those technical reasons didn't determine the outcome (we wouldn't have these damn SUVs if heaviness was that important). Both the electric and the steam car were hand crafted so they were expensive, whereas the patrol car began to be mass produced I'm factories which drove the prices down. Mass adoption followed which meant that Ford could afford to invest in infrastructure (pumps, mechanics etc.), which further cemented its position. In other words it wasn't just the technical aspects of the cars (e.g. the …