Phil in SF stopped reading Nonviolent Communication by Marshall B. Rosenberg
Giving up on this one too. I suspect there's dome good stuff here, but the author relates multiple examples that are just exhausting to contemplate.
Shitty person says something ("stigma of illegitimacy would be a good thing") Second person then guesses as to why the person might have expressed that. But has to express it in the form of a non judgemental question. Then shitty person and decent person go through a series of guessing game answers and questions.
Because we have to express ourselves nonviolently and seek to understand the good reasoning behind shitty people utterances and actions.
And... No.
