Sam rated The Lost Cause: 4 stars
The Lost Cause by Cory Doctorow
It’s thirty years from now. We’re making progress, mitigating climate change, slowly but surely. But what about all the angry …
Cooperator, luddite, and Atlantan. Solidarity forever 🌹. When not reading 📚 probably wants to be out swing or blues dancing 🕺, backpacking ⛺🥾, climbing 🧗, or mountain biking 🚵.
This link opens in a pop-up window
It’s thirty years from now. We’re making progress, mitigating climate change, slowly but surely. But what about all the angry …
Overall I enjoyed Callenbach's visions of a hopeful future. A few things felt out of place to me though:
The first was the "war games" which just didn't quite fit with the rest of the society, in my mind. It's quite possible I'm just missing something, but I couldn't understand why they were included or what their place in the functioning of the society was supposed to be (as a vent for toxic masculinity to express itself so that it doesn't permeate into every day life, maybe? It seems like this could be done with less injury). They're also part of broader problematic appropriation of indigenous culture by the almost exclusively white cast (more on that in a bit) in the book in a way that feels a bit tropey, which I didn't love.
Similarly, there's a very out-of-place feeling chapter in the middle where he randomly says (paraphrasing): "and …
Overall I enjoyed Callenbach's visions of a hopeful future. A few things felt out of place to me though:
The first was the "war games" which just didn't quite fit with the rest of the society, in my mind. It's quite possible I'm just missing something, but I couldn't understand why they were included or what their place in the functioning of the society was supposed to be (as a vent for toxic masculinity to express itself so that it doesn't permeate into every day life, maybe? It seems like this could be done with less injury). They're also part of broader problematic appropriation of indigenous culture by the almost exclusively white cast (more on that in a bit) in the book in a way that feels a bit tropey, which I didn't love.
Similarly, there's a very out-of-place feeling chapter in the middle where he randomly says (paraphrasing): "and of course integration doesn't work, so the black people have their own cities". Whoa, where did that come from? He tries to launder the idea into sounding virtuous by saying (again, paraphrasing) "but they were the ones who chose it for themselves and their cities are also doing well, it's no longer 'separate but equal', there really is a measure of economic justice", and, oddly, by having the (white) American be slightly disappointed by this situation, but again I just couldn't figure out why in the world that would be in there or what purpose it was supposed to have in the society. It really felt like he was trying to justify a personal view that he knew was wrong.
I suppose none of this is surprising from a white man in 1975, it's just so shocking how little it fits with the society he envisions in the rest of the book. Those 10 or so pages just really knocked it down a few notches for me. A brief search didn't turn up him ever having been asked about it, but if he was or if a future book addresses these problems further I'd love to know.
I ended up giving this book three stars because I agree with the general idea: we need more people who want to just get on a bike in simple every day ways without feeling pressured away from bicycles by people insisting that they need to be buying the latest-and-greatest gear or wearing lycra and cleats.
That being said, the author couches the entire book in terms of the "Unracer", which, while amusing, also feels a bit like the same gatekeepy behavior he's railing against. At the same time, he starts out talking about how many people he's going to offend in a very dismissive way that rubbed me wrong. If you have to start out giving a disclaimer, it seems worth just changing your tone. It's a bit arrogant to throw in the disclaimer in a "their feelings don't matter to me, so this is fine" sort of way. This …
I ended up giving this book three stars because I agree with the general idea: we need more people who want to just get on a bike in simple every day ways without feeling pressured away from bicycles by people insisting that they need to be buying the latest-and-greatest gear or wearing lycra and cleats.
That being said, the author couches the entire book in terms of the "Unracer", which, while amusing, also feels a bit like the same gatekeepy behavior he's railing against. At the same time, he starts out talking about how many people he's going to offend in a very dismissive way that rubbed me wrong. If you have to start out giving a disclaimer, it seems worth just changing your tone. It's a bit arrogant to throw in the disclaimer in a "their feelings don't matter to me, so this is fine" sort of way. This tone of superiority pervades the entire book, so while I agree with his premises generally I didn't enjoy reading it all that much.
Finally, in at least a few parts (the fitness chapter in particular), he goes off the rails a bit and insists that people should, eg. buy a blood glucose meter. That doesn't seem like something to recommend to the people we're trying to convince to just hop on a bike and ride without all the fluff. That being said, arguably that's just in the fitness chapter for the fitness buff who wants to use a bike for actual fitness, so maybe it's fine. It just felt out of place with the rest of the book.
Overall I lean towards two stars except that the general idea is great. Get on a bike and ride (just maybe grab a different book inspire you).
Just Ride is a revelation. Forget the ultralight, uncomfortable bikes, flashy jerseys, clunky shoes that clip onto tiny pedals, the …
Just had my first test ride on a new bike I built (new frame and fork, random garage or local bike co-op used parts for everything else). I went over to a local coffee shop to test it out so I thought I'd start a book about the sort of cycling I love before my ride back!
From Africanfuturist luminary Okorafor comes a new science fiction novel of intense action and thoughtful rumination on biotechnology, destiny, and …
The Silmarillion (Quenya: [silmaˈrilliɔn]) is a collection of myths and stories in varying styles by the English writer J. R. …
Content warning Spoilers about the decision taken in the end
It always amazes me how Banks can get away with writing books where, in the end, every action from the entire book comes to nothing. You know the big secret that it's building too more or less right at the beginning, then they confirm it's true, then they decide that they won't tell anyone and it wouldn't matter anyways even if they did. End of book. And yet, somehow, maybe because that's the point, it works every time.
The Scavenger species are circling. It is, truly, the End Days for the Gzilt civilization. An ancient people, organized on …
Two and a half millennia ago, the artifact appeared in a remote corner of space, beside a trillion-year-old dying sun …
In 2014, Maia Kobabe, who uses e/em/eir pronouns, thought that a comic of reading statistics would be the last autobiographical …