Prisoners of Geography

Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics

hardcover

Published Sept. 21, 2015 by Scribner, imusti.

ISBN:
978-1-78396-141-2
Copied ISBN!

View on OpenLibrary

4 stars (5 reviews)

In the bestselling tradition of Why Nations Fail and The Revenge of Geography, an award-winning journalist uses ten maps of crucial regions to explain the geo-political strategies of the world powers.

All leaders of nations are constrained by geography. Their choices are limited by mountains, rivers, seas, and concrete. To understand world events, news organizations and other authorities often focus on people, ideas, and political movements, but without geography, we never have the full picture. Now, in the relevant and timely Prisoners of Geography, seasoned journalist Tim Marshall examines Russia, China, the USA, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Japan and Korea, and Greenland and the Arctic—their weather, seas, mountains, rivers, deserts, and borders—to provide a context often missing from our political reportage: how the physical characteristics of these countries affect their strengths and vulnerabilities and the decisions made by their leaders.

In ten, up-to-date maps of each region, …

5 editions

Review of 'Prisoners of Geography' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

I love the topic of geography and maybe that's why I found this book on the thin side. I didn't learn much that I didn't already know. Overall it's a decent book that reads like a series of magazine articles. If you're not familiar with geopolitics this is a great introduction. And as long as you don't expect more than introductory level thinking about this topic then you'll probably like it. I was hoping for more.

Review of 'Prisoners of Geography' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

A really interesting brief discussion of each of several politically interesting parts of the world and how physical geography has either propelled or restrained the people and governments there. I don't know enough to say whether the arguments would stand up to serious scrutiny, but it's certainly an interesting point of view which doesn't often get discussed in news stories of conflicts between countries.

Having said that, sometimes I got the feeling that the arguments can become a bit circular. The same geographical situation in one case might be an explanation of a country's success while in another it is something the population have failed to capitalise on. In this case, I start to wonder how much the geography has explanatory power. All very interesting though and an extra dimension when considering world politics.