User Profile

Remy Rose

MxRemy@books.theunseen.city

Joined 1 year ago

She/they. I like knitting, math, and uplifting the proletariat.

This link opens in a pop-up window

2024 Reading Goal

Success! Remy Rose has read 12 of 12 books.

reviewed The magicians by Lev Grossman (Book one of the Magicians trilogy)

Lev Grossman: The magicians (2015, A Plume Book) 3 stars

"Quentin Coldwater's life is changed forever by an apparently chance encounter: when he turns up …

or, "The Incels of Narnia"

1 star

I am determined to finish at least the first book, even though I hate it. Actually, maybe it's because I hate it. I don't like to rate or review books I haven't finished, but I feel compelled to talk about how terrible this book is. The author is a frequent offender on r/menwritingwomen, and for good reason. He claims all the misogyny (among other things) is intentional, because the story is "filtered through the mind & eyes of a 17 year old boy". That's a pretty dubious claim on its face, and it doesn't really explain why all the other characters do and say what they do. Maybe I'll flesh this out more when I finish it.

On the other hand, generally the writing itself is decent enough, even if it gets a little purple prose at times. Just watch the show, it's 1000% better than the source material.

EDIT: …

reviewed Seeds for the Swarm by Sim Kern

Sim Kern: Seeds for the Swarm (2023, Stelliform Press) 4 stars

Rylla McCracken dreams of escaping her family's trailer in the Dust States to go to …

gotterdammerungangst

4 stars

Rylla is kind of the worst, but in like, a way that I think may be intentional. She's on a journey like Candide, and similarly you spend most of the book thinking "No! You dumbass, what are you doing?!", etc. All the other characters mostly introduce and weigh the merits of tons of different solutions to the earth dying, but I think you can really tell which ones get the book's stamp of approval. I think the author of this and the authors of Half Earth Socialism would get in a fight, because this book seems to lean into banking on ridiculous tech "solutions" that probably will never materialize and might easily cause more harm than good. But I don't know nothing about nothing, so maybe I read into it wrong.

EDIT: I thought about it and I think I was wrong. The primitivists were a valid critique and the …