After seeing Ron Charles mention this book in his newsletter ("a work of illustrated nonfiction that will awaken and haunt anyone who reads it"), I decided to check it out to mark the 4th anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It is powerful and very timely, providing important background on Russia's long history of aggression and also highlighting aspects of the authoritarian playbook in general.
User Profile
I got back into reading at the end of 2021 and it has been really fun. Once again, books are a big part of my life. Historical fiction, literary fiction, science fiction, etc., etc. Interested in politics, feminism, climate change, TV, movies, birding, biking, music, forest preserves, art museums, travel. UC Davis law grad, now in Chicago suburbs.
This link opens in a pop-up window
Brian Plunkett's books
2026 Reading Goal
20% complete! Brian Plunkett has read 4 of 20 books.
User Activity
RSS feed Back
Brian Plunkett reviewed A Brief History of a Long War by Mariam Naiem
A Brief History of a Long War - 4 Stars
4 stars
After seeing Ron Charles mention this book in his newsletter ("a work of illustrated nonfiction that will awaken and haunt anyone who reads it"), I decided to check it out to mark the 4th anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It is powerful and very timely, providing important background on Russia's long history of aggression and also highlighting aspects of the authoritarian playbook in general.
Brian Plunkett started reading Who Will Run the Frog Hospital by Lorrie Moore

Who Will Run the Frog Hospital by Lorrie Moore
"Berie Carr, an American woman visiting Paris with her husband, summons up for us a summer in 1972 when she …
Brian Plunkett started reading A Brief History of a Long War by Mariam Naiem
Brian Plunkett started reading Winter by Ali Smith
Brian Plunkett reviewed The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead
The Nickel Boys - 5 Stars
5 stars
A brutal gut punch, but so well done. It managed to convey the dread and the horror of everything happening at Nickel without being overly graphic, which I appreciated. Great audiobook narration by JD Jackson. I also enjoyed the later periods in NYC, which seem to foreshadow Harlem Shuffle a bit.
Brian Plunkett started reading The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead
Brian Plunkett started reading The Director: A Novel by Daniel Kehlmann
Brian Plunkett reviewed The Great Believers by Rebecca Makkai
The Great Believers - 5 Stars
5 stars
A+ storytelling and a great Chicago book. Very well written - and warmly written, too. By the end of the first chapter, I felt like I knew these characters as real people. The part focused on the 1990 AIDS demonstration was really moving. I'd had this on a back burner for a while but decided to dive in after seeing Mick Herron recommend it recently in The Guardian ... and after reading about the Republicans' infuriating funding cuts for global HIV/AIDS programs.
A+ storytelling and a great Chicago book. Very well written - and warmly written, too. By the end of the first chapter, I felt like I knew these characters as real people. The part focused on the 1990 AIDS demonstration was really moving. I'd had this on a back burner for a while but decided to dive in after seeing Mick Herron recommend it recently in The Guardian ... and after reading about the Republicans' infuriating funding cuts for global HIV/AIDS programs.
Brian Plunkett set a goal to read 20 books in 2026
Brian Plunkett started reading The Great Believers by Rebecca Makkai

The Great Believers by Rebecca Makkai
In 1985, Yale Tishman, the development director for an art gallery in Chicago, is about to pull off an amazing …
Brian Plunkett reviewed Audition by Katie Kitamura
Brian Plunkett started reading Audition by Katie Kitamura

Audition by Katie Kitamura
Two people meet for lunch in a Manhattan restaurant. She’s an accomplished actress in rehearsals for an upcoming premiere. He’s …
Brian Plunkett started reading Disappearing Earth by Julia Phillips
Brian Plunkett reviewed What We Can Know by Ian McEwan
What We Can Know - 5 Stars
5 stars
Very well-written, entertaining and thought-provoking. I really enjoyed the focus on Tom, a scholar about 100 years in the dystopian future, who is researching a lost poem and also trying to teach uninterested students about our world. His appreciation of the past (our present) is fun to experience, and it provides a great perspective. For example: "I prefer teaching the post-2015 period, when social media were beginning to be drawn into the currency of private lives, when waves of fantastical or malevolent or silly rumours began to shape the nature not only of politics but of human understanding. Fascinating!"
And I loved a lot of the writing. There's a description of Tom trying to access a container and get it open, using not quite the right tools, and it reminded me of so many home projects I've done over the years. The effort, anticipation and frustration are captured perfectly.
…Very well-written, entertaining and thought-provoking. I really enjoyed the focus on Tom, a scholar about 100 years in the dystopian future, who is researching a lost poem and also trying to teach uninterested students about our world. His appreciation of the past (our present) is fun to experience, and it provides a great perspective. For example: "I prefer teaching the post-2015 period, when social media were beginning to be drawn into the currency of private lives, when waves of fantastical or malevolent or silly rumours began to shape the nature not only of politics but of human understanding. Fascinating!"
And I loved a lot of the writing. There's a description of Tom trying to access a container and get it open, using not quite the right tools, and it reminded me of so many home projects I've done over the years. The effort, anticipation and frustration are captured perfectly.
The first part was funnier and more thrilling than the second part, but still it was great overall. And as for the title, what we can know is ... hard to say. Even things that people write in their journals may be false or misleading. And when the record isn't clear, Tom struggles with how to proceed: "Surely it was permissible to make educated guesses about the subjective states and lines of thought of people who had died a hundred years ago. Perhaps it was not."








